Latest News

MAY 2017

Wheatsheaf

Annual Parish Meeting

08.05.17 7pm

RAINFORD PARISH COUNCIL
 
TO ALL ELECTORS OF THE PARISH OF
RAINFORD
 
YOU ARE ENTITLED AND INVITED TO ATTEND YOUR
 
ANNUAL PARISH MEETING
on
8 MAY 2016 AT 7pm
at
 
RAINFORD VILLAGE HALL
under the Chairmanship of Councillor Diane Nichols,
Chairman of Rainford Parish Council
 
The Parish meeting may, by law, discuss all Parish affairs and pass resolutions about them.  The following items are on the agenda.
Please contact the Parish Clerk on 01744 884709  [email protected]
By 03.05.17 if you wish to address the meeting
 
1.             Chairman’s Review of Parish Council Affairs 2016-2017
 2.     Financial Report       
3.     Borough Councillors’ Report
4.     Open Forum
 
                      Diane Nichols     
Signature:  …………………………….. (Chairman)

RAINFORD PARISH COUNCIL
 
MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL PARISH MEETING
HELD IN THE RECEPTION ROOM AT RAINFORD VILLAGE HALL
ON MONDAY 16 MAY 2016 COMMENCING AT 7PM
 
Present:                      Councillors: Grice, G Jones, P Jones, Lee, Long, D Mussell, L Mussell,
D  Nichols, Reynolds (Chairman), Wesley
 
In attendance:           1 Resident
S Powell (Clerk)
                                    Victoria Nelson (Admin Assistant)
                                   
Apologies:                  Councillors: Brown (on holiday), Monk (ill), R Nichols (away on business)
 
Absent:                       Councillors: Aspinall, Collins
 
Councillor Reynolds welcomed everyone to the meeting.
 
Minutes of the Annual Parish Meeting held on Tuesday 19 May 2015 were circulated and approved unanimously as a correct record.
 
1.         Chairman’s Review of Parish Council Affairs 2015 – 2016
Councillor Rob Reynolds gave the following report:
 
It’s been another very busy year for the Parish Council and we’ve faced some significant challenges, but we’ve got through them all.
 
One of my biggest tasks as chairman has been delivering flowers to couples on their golden and diamond wedding anniversaries, this can be very time consuming when there are three or four such celebrations in a week but it is also one of the nicest parts of the job of being chairman and a nice way in which the Parish Council is involved in the community.
 
I was also involved in unveiling the new war memorial in Crank, which was a great occasion. It really is a great testament to the community that they decided to plan and fund the project themselves
 
The Parish Council is also involved with the service of remembrance at All Saints church and it was a huge honour to be involved as chairman and to meet some of our veterans afterwards.
 
During the year the Parish Council held our first beer festival. This was a huge success with over 300 people coming through the doors over two days and a substantial sum being raised for Rainford in Bloom. It was the first year we’ve done it and we made mistakes but we will learn from these and I’m confident that there will be another beer festival next year and that this will be even better than the first one.
 
We also held our first afternoon tea, which again saw large numbers of people visiting the village hall and was a big success. Sally and Vicky did a lot of work on both projects and I am very grateful for their efforts.
 
At the beginning of the year we conducted a health and safety review of the building and made some significant improvements to the village hall. These were very expensive but were, I think, entirely necessary and have contributed to ensuring the hall continues to be a fantastic asset for our community. We’ve also undertaken significant repairs to the fabric of the building, principally the roof. Again this was expensive but absolutely necessary.
 
Thanks to Cllrs Diane Nichols and Diane Wesley the Parish Council has also been closely involved in Rainford in Bloom and this has been another big success story. We’ve organised litter picks, planted 4,500 daffodil bulbs, planted flowers around the new war memorial in Crank, placed 19 planters around the parish and have 10 more ready to be placed in the coming weeks. We’ve also allocated a plot of land for the local Cubs and Scouts to make into a community garden and hopefully further progress will be made on that soon. Last year we won a silver medal at the North West in Bloom awards, a remarkable achievement and one that we are looking to improve on this year, if we can.
 
I think that involvement in community projects like Rainford in Bloom is going to be a big part of the Parish Council’s future. We are also looking at organising a food festival and a garden competition for next year and I am looking into whether we can set up an occasional community cinema night.
 
Cllr Diane Nichols has been a great support as deputy chairman and I am sure that she will make an excellent chairman. She was made a partner at BDO before she was 30 and is successfully running her own business, she has the right skills to take this council forwards.
 
It has been an honour to serve as chairman and I look forward to the council’s future with a lot of optimism.
 
 
2.         Finance Report
Copies of the Balance Sheet as at 31.03.16 were circulated.
Councillor P Jones gave an account of the financial position of the Parish Council, stating that several unexpected expenses had occurred including repairs to the roof and the Chain of office.
 
3.         Borough Councillor’s Report
Councillor Reynolds reported the following:
·         The proposed sex shop on the East Lancashire road had generated a petition containing 300 names and 261 objections.  He had had to leave the meeting of the Licensing committee to attend the Annual Parish Meeting and the decision had not been made before his departure.
Councillor L Mussell reported the following:
·         The annual Mayor Making ceremony would be taking place on 18.05.16
·         The work on Pasture Lane had been delayed due to it being a greater problem than originally thought
·         Regular meetings would now be taking place between the Borough Councillors and the Police Sergeant at Moss Bank Police station to discuss policing issues affecting Rainford.
 
 
4.         Rainford in Bloom
Councillor Reynolds gave an update.  It had been a busy year with several hundred bulbs being planted.  More planters would be sited around the Village shortly.  Additions for the coming year include a garden competition and work around the railway station at Rainford Junction.
 
5.         Open Forum
                                i.            Councillor L Mussell expressed disconcertion at the lack of residents attending the meeting.  A discussion took place regarding the communication or lack of it between the Parish Council and the community of Rainford.  A notice board within the Junction Pub and greater use of the Facebook page were suggestions of ways to improve communication, along with a tag on any email inviting people to attend Council meetings.
                              ii.            A discussion took place regarding recycling and the pilot scheme that has been taking place in Rainford Junction.  During the past year, Rainford has not been as good at recycling as previously.
                            iii.            A query was raised via email regarding the multiple business signs on Sandwash Industrial estate.  Councillor L Mussell stated that she would raise the issue at a meeting she would be attending on 17.05.16.
                             iv.            An email had been received from a resident asking for a dog waste bin to be sited at the access to the Linear Way from Lakeside Gardens/Southerns Lane.  Councillor L Mussell stated that the Borough Councillors had funded dog waste bins at both ends of this section of the Linear Way.  The Borough Councillors will discuss the possibility of another bin, but it would be dependent on funding being available.
                               v.            Councillor L Mussell informed the meeting that the company building the houses on the site of the Ex-Servicemen’s club had applied to have the cut through to the Linear Way removed from the plans.
 
The Chairman stated that the future for the Parish Council is good.  It had been more proactive over the year and would continue to be so moving forward, taking opportunities to learn new and better ways.
As there were no further issues, the Chairman thanked everyone for their attendance and declared the Annual Parish meeting closed at 7.50pm.  
 
 
 
 
SIGNED:                      .................................................................                  
Chairman


 
RPC

Rainford Parish Council

Next Meeting Friday 19.05.17 - 6.30pmpm

The following meetings of
Rainford Parish Council 
will take place in MAY  2017:
 
Community Development Committee  Wednesday 03.05.17 at 7pm
 
Annual Parish Meeting
Monday 08.05.17 at 7pm
This meeting will take place in the Reception Room
 
Finance, Planning & Administration Committee
Wednesday 17.05.17 at 6.30pm
 
Annual Meeting of the Parish Council
Immediately followed by the
Full Council Meeting
Friday 19.05.17 at 6.30pm
 
All meetings will take place in the Council Chamber at
Rainford Village Hall
Members of the press & public are invited to attend
Requests to address the Council should be made in writing to the Clerk by 12.05.17
[email protected]
01744 884709
Rainford Village Hall, Church Road, Rainford, WA11 8HB
 
Wheatsheaf

Rainford Parish Council

Submission to St Helens Council regarding the Local Plan Preferred Options

This document is Rainford Parish Council’s submission to the St Helens Council Local Plan Preferred Options Consultation
 
The current preferred options include the proposal to build 1100 dwellings within the Parish of Rainford on Green Belt land.  While the Parish Council recognises the need to provide new housing and employment across the Borough, it wishes to make the following comments and observations in relation to the existing document:
 
The Proposed Housing Allocation Sites HA14 & HA 15 included in Phase 1 of the plan
It is understood that the current proposals would see up to 300 dwellings being built on these Green Belt sites.  The existing Village does not have the infrastructure and services to provide for such a sudden high percentage increase in the population:
v  Rainford has 2 Doctors surgeries and 2 Dental practices.  Anecdotal evidence suggests that waiting a week or more for an appointment with a doctor is commonplace.  Neither of the dental practices presently accepts NHS patients.
 
v  Although no estimate for the number of new residents is given, it is reasonable to assume that many of the occupants of the proposed housing would be less than 18 years of age.  While the CE Primary School is currently undersubscribed by 26 places, 15 of these are in one year group. Although Corpus Christi and Brook Lodge Primary schools may both currently have the capacity for extra pupils, this is not on a scale to accommodate the number of children requiring places.  All three of the primary schools in the Village have little or no room for expansion.  This would mean that a substantial proportion of children residing within Rainford could not be educated within the Village, or that a new primary school would have to be built. 
No site is identified within the plan for this purpose.
 Rainford High School was oversubscribed by in excess of 100 places for the September 2016 intake.  The Parish Council understands that the school has increased its PAN by 20 to 290, with 10 entry classes, which was approved by St Helens Council.  Rainford High has ambitions to increase 6th Form pupil numbers as part of its academisation plans, the fulfilment of which will bring the infrastructure of the school to capacity. 
There is no provision for the secondary education of an increased number of resident 11 – 18 year olds within the plan.
 
v  The current limited retail offering within the Village would not be able to support the requirements of an additional 3000 residents and there is no provision within the plan for additional retail outlets.
 
v  It is commonly estimated that for every new home built, the occupiers will have 2 cars.  The roads in and around Rainford were not designed or built to accommodate the volume of traffic the first phase of building would create and it is impossible to envisage how the traffic generated by an additional 800 dwellings would be managed.  Indeed, many of the roads in the Village, (for example Mossborough Road), struggle to cope with the prevailing vehicular movement.  Furthermore, there are frequent accidents, some of a serious nature, at the junction of Mill Lane and Higher Lane and the junction of Mill Lane and the Rainford by-pass (A570).  Building houses at site HA15 would further aggravate this dangerous situation.  Additionally, much of the extra traffic would wish to travel through Windle Island during the rush hour period.  It is the understanding of the Parish Council that the works shortly to commence at this busy junction are expected to be a solution to the existing traffic problems at this location, not to alleviate the anticipated increases due to the implementation of the Local Plan.
The lack of available parking in the Village centre is also an existing issue and further development on such a large scale would only exacerbate this problem.  The roads accessing sites HA14 & HA15 are in the main too narrow for the high number of HGVs that would be required during development. 
No provision has been made in the plan to cope with the extra traffic generated either in or around Rainford or for improving the access roads to the Village.
 
v  The high volume of cars travelling in, out and through Rainford is partly due to the very poor public transport services.  The bus services that are available do not connect with the meagre rail services, and it is impossible to get to and from either Liverpool or Manchester by train in the evening from Rainford.
 
Other General Observations regarding the content of the Plan
FLOOD RISK
Much of the land within Rainford is prone to flooding and remains such despite remedial works.  This is particularly true of sites HA14, HA15, HS18, HS19, HS20 & HS21.  Development on these sites would cause even greater problems in adjacent areas and it is difficult to see how the stipulation in the plan that the water flow rate must remain the same post development as it was before, is achievable.
 
AGRICULTURAL LAND
All the Green Belt sites identified for development within Rainford in the Preferred Options consist of Grade 1 agricultural land.  People need to be fed as well as housed and there is no provision in the plan for the recovery of this lost farming land in other areas of the Borough.  Agriculture and its associated industries are major commercial activities and the highest source of employment within the Parish.  No consideration is given to the amount of land locally (and nationally) that is required for growing food or more importantly perhaps, the effect on the local economy of building on farmer’s fields.  The Parish Council would question the morality of building on land which produces 2 and sometimes 3 crops per annum.
 
 
POPULATION
Rainford Parish Council does not accept the premise made in the plan that 570 new homes per year will be required and queries whether the ‘Brexit’ referendum decision has been factored into the population figures the Council has used to predict housing requirements.  It is not unrealistic to assume that EU migration into St Helens will decline over the timescale of the Development Plan.  The population of the Borough is currently decreasing with the greatest exodus in the 25 - 44 age group:  the very people that developers wishing to build on Rainford’s Green Belt would want to target.  The overall effect is a further reduction in population numbers and this calls into question the Council’s statistics in predicting housing requirements in the Borough over the stated 15 years and beyond. Furthermore, there are newly built houses within the Borough that have still not been sold, despite being available for some time.  Rainford Parish Council would suggest there is insufficient evidence to support the perceived need for the number of houses required.  Therefore the case for using Green Belt land constituting the exceptional circumstances required to release the land for development is invalid.
 
BROWNFIELD SITES
It is the understanding of the Parish Council that there are a sufficient number of Brown Field sites within the Borough to fulfil the perceived housing and industry requirement.  Although more costly to develop, building on these sites would provide affordable housing within walking distance of St Helens Town Centre.  This would provide employment and thus stimulate and boost the economy of a town currently struggling to attract both business and residents.  Leaving ugly Brown Field contaminated sites as they are is not going to alleviate this situation.  Building dwellings on the Green Belt in Rainford will not alleviate this situation.  Building affordable homes close to the town centre will.
 
INFILL
In recent years, a number of dwellings have been built in Rainford on small plots of land and the Parish Council have supported these initiatives which have put unused land to good use.  The Parish Council wish to propose that in order to maintain the rural and Village nature of Rainford, smaller plots of land are identified where minor developments could take place which would not damage the infrastructure of the Village.  It would be possible to integrate and absorb the resultant additional number of dwellings and residents, which would not be the case if the many hectares of Green Belt land the plan proposes are developed.
 
Conclusion
In conclusion, Rainford Parish Council maintains that Rainford does not have the infrastructure to support the large scale development proposed on Green Belt sites within the Village.  The current preferred options for Rainford are completely disproportionate given the current size and rural nature of the Village and the limited facilities and services available.  Flooding of the sites and/or of adjacent land should be a great cause for concern and St Helens Council should be mindful of the wider effects of releasing  Grade 1 agricultural land from the Green Belt for the building of houses.
The Parish Council does not consider that St Helens Council has successfully made the argument for the ‘exceptional circumstances’ required for releasing Green Belt land for development as it questions the validity of the assumptions made regarding the increase of the population and need for housing within the Borough during the time frame of the plan.
Rainford Parish Council suggests that Brown Field sites within the Borough, even if they are more problematic, would be more appropriate for development as this would have the added advantage of assisting in the rejuvenation of St Helens Town Centre.  The Parish Council would support small scale developments within the Parish.
 

Paint Pots

ART EXHIBITION

5 - 8.10.17

 

ART EXHIBITION
RAINFORD VILLAGE HALL   

 
Residents of Rainford and adjacent districts are invited to submit paintings, pottery, sculpture or handicraft for display at the above exhibition.
Exhibits will be accepted from all age groups 
 
***Exhibits must be ready for hanging***
All enquiries to the Parish Clerk’s Office
Telephone: 01744 884709 
[email protected]
More information »
Wheatsheaf

Second Quarter Report

April - September 2016

Click here to download a copy of the Report »
Wheatsheaf

Quarterly Report

April - June 2016


Click here to download a copy of the Report »